
Appearance
The most desired of these are those with eyes, especially the nine-eyed dZi (which lends more credence that these beads are from the time of the Bon faith, as nine was an important number in that religion whereas it is not important in the Buddhist religion). Also these beads are tubular, generally 1-2 inches long, though there have been cases of longer ones, must contain the shine associated with good dZi, and be in relatively good shape. One interesting type that does not represent the typical dZi at all, but is considered in their family is the "luk me" Dzi, or "sheep's eye". This is a tabular bead with circles representing eyes or moons on either or both sides.
Beck divided these beads into three periods. His Early Period (before 2000 BC) corresponds to the Harappan or Indus Valley Civilization, now dated to ca. 2600-1700 BC. This tabular etched bead was obtained in Egypt. Stylistically, it m
His Middle Period (300 BC to AD 200) corresponds to what Indians call the Early Historic Period, now put at something more like 500 BC to AD 500. These are typical designs from that period.atches these old beads, but there is no way of knowing how old it is.
His Late Period (500 to 1000 AD) is now understood to have been mostly the work of Persians, rather than Indians. The Indian industry survived, but few etched beads are found in India, being found in modern Iran and westward, traded into the Middle East and Russia.

The design on the bead on the right is a well -known motif of the Persian Sasanian (2nd to 7th century AD) dynasty.

Beck also recorded two types of etched beads. Type One has white lines on the red stone, as do the beads above. Type Two has black lines on a white bead as at left.
In some cases the original stone may have been white, as with this bead. The broken end shows that the stone was white (whether the bead above was or not, is hard to say).
However, in most cases, Type Two beads are made from carnelians that have first been whitened all over and then had the black lines added. The broken side of this Persian bead shows that clearly.
Dikshit also designed a Type Three, which has black lines drawn directly on the red carnelian. These are extremely rare. He also noted two varieties of black on top of white figures and the two colors side by side. These are also very rare.
What should be regarded as a variety has white lines on a darkened bead. These are usually considered to be "black agate," but all that I could examine are artificially darkened gray chalcedony (like this one) or carnelian.
What should be regarded as a variety has white lines on a darkened bead. These are usually considered to be "black agate," but all that I could examine are artificially darkened gray chalcedony (like this one) or carnelian.

There are also varieties not considered in these schemes. The Harappan Civilization experimented with different combinations. This is a small gray jasper bead that has been etched. Probably Persian.
The last known Indian to etch carnelians was Saheb Dino of Sehwan (now in Pakistan). He was interviewed in 1930 by Ernest Mackay (1933) and said that he had not done the work for 55 years. He did not make beads, but plaques with passages from the Qor'an.
Here we learned how the process was done. The bead or plaque was fixed in a clay mold tempered with cotton. When it was dried some soda (potassium can also be used) mixed with the juice of the Kirar plant (related to capers) was painted on the stone. (The plant juice had no chemical effect; it only made the mixture opaque so that it could be seen.) The stone was then put into the embers of a charcoal fire for five minutes, then removed and cleaned.
Beck (1933:384-385; 1934:193) determined that the alkali penetrated the surface of the bead/plaque and spread out just under it. The indelible white line is usually quite smooth to the touch. The black lines seem most likely to have been done with copper (Beck 1933: 385).
Persians continued to make etched beads in the Early Islamic Period. There are a number at Nishapur, Iran (founded by the Sasanians and destroyed in 1221). Later they switched to plaques with Qor'anic verses. They were still being made in the 1930s. A knowledgeable dealer in the late 1970s told me the work had stopped about 50 years before.

Plaques that resemble them now are actually etched. The designs are cut into the stone with acid and filled in with white paint or something similar.
Mythology
Their origin is said to be from ancient times when semi-gods wore them as ornaments. Whenever the dZi became blemished slightly, they were thrown to the earth. This might be an attempt to explain why the beads are never found in perfect condition. Once they fell to earth, they manifested as insects. There are several stories regarding the dZi as insects.The stories discuss how the dZi were once insects that moved like worms in the earth, but had become petrified, usually by the touch of human hand. One story involves a man who saw one these insects high in the mountains and threw his hat over it to capture it. When he removed the hat, the insect had become petrified and in its place lay a dZi. Another set of the insect stories relate that they were encountered in the high mountains by someone with especially good karma who managed to catch them. But in coming into contact with the defilement of human touch they had become petrified. Sometimes these insect dZi are found in cattle dung or the horns of slaughtered animals. This insect theory is widespread and is often cited to explain why a great number of Dzi are often found at once, forming a kind of "nest". Some believe that even after the beads have been unearthed they will continue to move for a little while.
It protects the owner from the "evil eye"The Dzi, particularly those of sought after patterns, command high prices and are very difficult to come by. Most Tibetans will not let go of a Dzi once they have it because it provides them with protection, and may cause bad luck if they were to get rid of it.
Gemmology
The trade classifies Dzis into three Types and two Varieties. (SOURCE?)
- Type I: A white design on natural stone background
- Type II: A black design on a whitened background
- Type III: A black design on a natural stone background
- Variety A: A combination of I and II--part of the bead is first whitened leaving part of the bead unwhitened and black designs are etched over the whitened part
- Variety B: A combination of I and III--both black and white patterns appear on the same bead but do not overlap

"An Indian glass imitation. The blue colour is a dead give-away. The white was added by putting powdered white glass in a mold and rolling the hot blue base over it, picking up the white. It is known as "powder-glass decoration." http://www.thebeadsite.com/bmms-etq.htm

"A really bad imitation. Apparently blackened bone. The lines were cut into the body and then filled with white paint or some such substance." http://www.thebeadsite.com/bmms-etq.htm
- Use of radiological dating to accertain date of specimens
- SEM studies of surface structure may provide further understanding of surface treatment and production of dZis
- LA-ICP-MS, SIMS to deduce treatment agents(etchants).
- Dr. Jack Ogden suggested thermoluminescence dating to detect when specimens were last heated; (but wouldn't work with translucent stones or where the heat needed to
sample deep inside the stone caused too much localised heat)
- Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzi_Bead
- The dZi beads of Tibet by Shana Rosenberg http://www.angelfire.com/va3/yanawomackphd/
- http://www.donations-blessing-tibetan-karma-thai-amulets-merits.com/dzi.html
- The two most important works are Etched Carnelian Beads by Horace Beck (1933) and Etched Beads in India by M.G. Dikshit (1949).
- Etched Beads and dZi Beads By Peter Francis, Jr.
No idea with regards to relatively recent ones (Roman and earlier are less a problem - so far)
There are a lot of DZI fakes around. If they use similar sources of stones and similar techniques to the traditional ones, then I am not sure where you might start. Unless they use different alkalis or something.
I suppose thermoluminescence dating might say when they were last heated (but wouldn't work with translucent stones or where the heat needed to sample deep inside the stone caused too much localised heat).
| Chemical Composition | |
| Crystallographic System | |
| Cleavage | |
| Fracture | |
| Fracture Lustre | |
| Habit |
Physical Characteristics
| Hardness | |
| Toughness | |
| Specific Gravity | |
| Streak |
Optical Characteristics
| Colour and Cause | |
| Degree of Transparency | |
| Polish Lustre | |
| Refractive Index | |
| Birefringence | |
| Optic Character | |
| Pleochroism | |
| Dispersion | |
| Phenomena | |
| X-Ray Fluorescence | |
| Transparency to X-Rays | |
| Ultraviolet Fluorescence | |
| Chelsea Filter Reaction | |
| Absorption Spectra |
Description
| Appearance | |
| Variety and Trade Names | |
| Misnomers | |
| Typical Size Range | |
| Typical Cutting Styles |
Treatments
Synthetics
Origin
Locality
Care
|
Cleaning Methods
|
ultrasonic: steamer: warm soapy water: |
| Stability | reaction to heat: stability to light: reaction to chemicals: |
Market
|
Availability
|
|
| Public Recognition | |
| Wearability | |
| Recommended Disclosures | |
| Value |
Key Separations, Suggestions for Testing and Evaluation
Bibliography and Suggested Further Reading



